Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    46 Important Account-Based Marketing Statistics for the Modern Marketer

    Motion Picture Association will work with Congress to start blocking piracy websites in the United States

    Excellent Support Guide: Unlock Cloud Success

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Tech Empire Solutions
    • Home
    • Cloud
    • Cyber Security
    • Technology
    • Business Solution
    • Tech Gadgets
    Tech Empire Solutions
    Home » Want to know what “blatant illegal behavior” looks like?Court opinion on how defendants harmed small businesses offers insight
    Business Solution

    Want to know what “blatant illegal behavior” looks like?Court opinion on how defendants harmed small businesses offers insight

    techempireBy techempire1 Comment3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email

    Small businesses are the engine that drives the American economy, and capital is the fuel that drives them forward. So when fast-talkers target small businesses with deceptive or unfair tactics, the FTC takes action. Following a jury trial in January 2024, a federal court verdict ordered business cash advance company owner Jonathan Braun to pay $20.3 million in monetary and civil relief for misleading small businesses and unlawfully seizing their assets. fine. Read on for some shocking examples of what the court described as Braun’s “lack of remorse for his blatantly unlawful conduct.”

    In 2020, the FTC indicted Braun, his company, RCG Advances (formerly Richmond Capital Group), and four other defendants, accusing them of defrauding small business owners about how much money they would receive and how much they would have to pay back. But it didn’t end there. To force customers to pay, Braun used unfair collection tactics, including threats of physical violence against small business owners who were already struggling to make ends meet.

    The lawsuit also accuses Braun and other defendants of making unauthorized withdrawals from consumer accounts and requires small business owners to sign judgments as part of their contracts. The documents purportedly allow defendants to seek an uncontested judgment directly from the court in the event of an alleged breach of contract. But Braun and his compatriots illegally and unfairly used these sentencing depositions to seize consumers’ personal and business assets in circumstances not permitted under their financing contracts and certainly not intended by their clients. Other defendants reached settlements with the FTC that resulted in industrial injunctions and monetary relief for small businesses totaling more than $2 million.

    How serious was Braun’s violation? So shocking. Braun repeatedly “demonstrated a complete disregard for how his actions would impact his clients,” according to the final verdict. For example, Braun bragged to a colleague that he had “made $3,200 on a previous $5,000 trade.” Haha. ” Indeed haha.

    Braun reserves his harshest criticism for customers who have trouble paying. Braun threatened to send a consumer to jail and said he would spit in the person’s “fucking face” in jail, according to a recording entered into evidence. Braun also urged the man to drive his car “off a cliff,” calling the customer a “fucking lowlife,” a “loser,” a “degenerate” and a “piece of shit.”

    In October 2023, the court issued an order permanently banning Braun from participating in the merchant cash advance business and debt collection industry. The final decision in February 2024 supported the court’s conclusion that Braun “lacked remorse,” citing a particularly telling comment Braun made in an email to the company involved:

    “It doesn’t matter, I’ll beat this asshole at his own game. They may be cunning and shady, but they never thought they’d meet a cunning asshole.” Like me, I’ll rock his world. . . . I would get paid and make another grown man cry again. “

    The court entered a $3,421,067 judgment to redress the harm caused to the small business by Braun’s misconduct. Additionally, the court imposed a civil penalty of $16,956,000 on Braun for his violations, stating:

    “The evidence demonstrates that Mr. Braun and his co-defendants exercised considerable control and authority over them in violation of the GLB [Gramm-Leach-Bliley] Acted 942 times. Mr. Braun bragged about his illegal behavior and treated it as a joke, which makes this widespread misconduct all the more egregious. . . ”.

    Significant harm to small businesses in need of capital? This is not a funny thing for judges, juries, the FTC, and certainly not for the business owners that Braun lied to, overcharged, and intimidated.

    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    techempire
    • Website

    Related Posts

    46 Important Account-Based Marketing Statistics for the Modern Marketer

    What they are and when to use them

    Why you should enter a business case competition

    How to become a cost estimator and succeed

    Vertical solutions will emerge in 2024

    The leader in retail technology solutions

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Reviews
    Editors Picks

    46 Important Account-Based Marketing Statistics for the Modern Marketer

    Motion Picture Association will work with Congress to start blocking piracy websites in the United States

    Excellent Support Guide: Unlock Cloud Success

    A progressive and proven vision for digital transformation

    Legal Pages
    • About Us
    • Disclaimer
    • DMCA
    • Privacy Policy
    Our Picks

    Embracer sells majority stake in Saber Interactive in deal worth approximately $500 million

    What they are and when to use them

    Why you should enter a business case competition

    Top Reviews

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.