New York Times be accused On Wednesday, OpenAI and Microsoft filed a copyright infringement lawsuit demanding that ChatGPT and any other large language models and training sets that use The Times’ work be destroyed without payment.
This is the first major media organization to sue the creators of ChatGPT, a ruling that could set a precedent for fair use laws in artificial intelligence. The lawsuit accuses OpenAI and Microsoft of using copyrighted material from The New York Times to train artificial intelligence models. What’s more, it claims that ChatGPT and Bing Chat frequently reproduce long, verbatim copies of New York Times articles. This allows ChatGPT users to bypass the New York Times’ paywall, and the lawsuit claims that generative AI has now become a competitor to the newspaper as a reliable source of information. The New York Times’ lawsuit seeks to hold the companies liable for “billions of dollars in statutory and actual damages” and seeks the destruction of “all GPT or other LLM models and training sets containing Times Works.”
OpenAI and Microsoft did not immediately respond to Gizmodo’s request for comment.
“There’s another component to what these AI companies are going for, which is, for lack of a better word, power,” said Sarah Silverman, who represents OpenAI in a separate copyright lawsuit against OpenAI. said Michael Butterick, an attorney for the other book authors. “They now want to break the backbone of copyright law so that the people who own the copyright don’t have veto power over what AI companies do in the future.”
The court will ultimately have to decide whether training artificial intelligence on the open web is protected by U.S. fair use law. Fair use allows for restricted use of copyrighted works in certain circumstances, such as short snippets of articles in Google search results. Lawyers representing The Times said ChatGPT and Bing Chat’s use of copyrighted material was more serious than what appeared in search results. This is because search engines provide prominent hyperlinks to publisher articles, while Microsoft and OpenAI’s chatbots hide the source of information.
Apple has reportedly recently begun negotiating deals with major news publishers to use their content in the training of the company’s generative artificial intelligence systems New York Times. Apple has lagged behind rivals in artificial intelligence in terms of public statements, but its ability to avoid major copyright cases facing OpenAI and Microsoft will give it a good chance of catching up. OpenAI itself recently reached partnership Partnered with publisher Axel Springer to use content from Politico and other publishers in ChatGPT’s answers. The New York Times reportedly contacted OpenAI about cooperation in April, but no resolution has been reached.
The outcome of this lawsuit, and others like it in San Francisco, could have a significant impact on the future of artificial intelligence.Early innovators in artificial intelligence, such as Google, Adobe, and Microsoft, provided Protect users in court If they find themselves involved in a copyright case, the companies themselves are accused of copyright infringement. The New York Times’ lawsuit will help define OpenAI and Microsoft’s role in the artificial intelligence revolution. If The New York Times wins, it would be a major opportunity for other big tech giants like Apple and Google to get ahead.
